Short answer
MT700 is the SWIFT message an issuing bank uses to issue a documentary credit; MT760 issues a demand guarantee or standby letter of credit; MT799 is a free-format message that carries text but no undertaking by itself; MT103 is a customer payment instruction. Only banks send them, bank to bank, and each proves only what its sender actually committed to.
Key points
- SWIFT messages travel between financial institutions identified by a BIC. A company, broker or adviser cannot send an MT700 or MT760 itself.
- MT700 (documentary credit) and MT760 (guarantee or standby) carry the bank’s undertaking. MT799 is free format and does not create a guarantee, block funds or prove funds by itself.
- The pre-advice recognised by UCP 600 (article 11) concerns documentary credits and is sent as MT705, not as an “MT799 pre-advice” of an SBLC.
- An MT103 shows that a payment instruction was sent, not that the beneficiary has been credited. Cross-border payments have moved to ISO 20022, while trade messages (MT7xx) still use the MT format.
- A PDF or screenshot of a “SWIFT copy” proves nothing. Only your own bank can confirm that an authenticated message was received.
What is a SWIFT MT message?
Swift is a secure messaging network used by banks and other financial institutions. Each participant is identified by a Business Identifier Code (BIC). “MT” messages are the traditional Swift message types, numbered by category: category 1 covers customer payments, category 2 transfers between financial institutions, and category 7 documentary credits, guarantees and standby letters of credit.
Two points are often misunderstood. First, Swift transports messages; it does not guarantee, verify or fund the transactions described in them. The legal value of a message comes from the bank that sends it and the terms it contains. Second, only Swift participants send messages, and banks normally exchange them only with institutions they have authorised to send them traffic. A trader, a broker or an adviser has no way to “send an MT760” on anyone’s behalf.
The main messages at a glance
| Message | Name | Usually sent by → to | What it is not |
|---|---|---|---|
| MT700 / MT701 | Issue of a documentary credit (MT701 continues a long MT700) | Issuing bank → advising bank | Not a payment; payment depends on a complying presentation |
| MT705 | Pre-advice of a documentary credit | Issuing bank → advising bank | Not the operative credit itself |
| MT707 | Amendment to a documentary credit | Issuing bank → advising bank | Not binding on the beneficiary until accepted |
| MT760 | Issue of a demand guarantee / standby letter of credit | Issuing bank → advising bank, or → a correspondent asked to issue a local guarantee | Not proof of blocked funds, not a tradable asset |
| MT767 / MT765 | Amendment to a guarantee or standby / demand under it | Between the banks involved | — |
| MT799 | Free-format message (documentary credits and guarantees category) | Any bank → a correspondent | Not an undertaking unless its text and sender’s authority make it one; never a guarantee by format |
| MT103 | Single customer credit transfer | Ordering customer’s bank → next bank in the chain | Not proof that the beneficiary was credited |
How does an MT700 work?
When a buyer’s bank issues a letter of credit, it usually sends an MT700 to a bank in the seller’s country, the advising bank. The message contains structured fields: form of credit, applicable rules (typically UCP latest version, meaning UCP 600), expiry date and place, amount, applicant, beneficiary, how and where the credit is available, shipment details, description of goods, documents required, additional conditions and confirmation instructions (CONFIRM, MAY ADD or WITHOUT).
Under UCP 600, an authenticated teletransmission of the credit is the operative instrument (article 11), and an advising bank that advises it signifies that it has satisfied itself as to its apparent authenticity (article 9). In practice this is why a seller should receive the credit through its own bank, not as an emailed file.
Example (illustrative): a buyer in Côte d’Ivoire asks its bank to issue a credit in favour of a supplier in Spain. The Ivorian bank sends an MT700 to the supplier’s Spanish bank, which checks apparent authenticity and passes the credit to the supplier. If the buyer later extends the shipment date, the issuing bank sends an MT707, which the supplier may accept or reject.
What does an MT760 prove?
MT760 is the message used to issue a demand guarantee or a standby letter of credit. It may be sent to an advising bank that passes the undertaking to the beneficiary, or to a correspondent bank asking it to issue its own local guarantee against the counter-guarantee of the sender. The message states the applicable rules, typically URDG 758 for demand guarantees or ISP98 for standbys, along with the amount, expiry, beneficiary and the conditions of a demand.
An MT760 proves that the sending bank issued (or requested the issue of) an undertaking on the stated terms. It does not prove that the applicant’s cash is “blocked” for the beneficiary, that the instrument is “cash-backed”, or that it can be sold, leased or “monetized”. A guarantee is an obligation of the issuing bank to pay against a complying demand, nothing more and nothing less. Offers to deliver an “MT760 from a top bank” for a fee, to a party with no relationship with that bank, should be treated as a warning sign.
Have a real transaction that needs an instrument? Tell us about it in two short steps. We review the operation and reply within 24 hours on business days with the options and next steps.
Discuss your transactionIs an MT799 a commitment?
MT799 is the free-format message of category 7. Like the other free-format messages (MT199, MT299, MT999), it carries narrative text for which no structured message is used: queries, preliminary information, confirmations of details. Its format gives it no special legal weight. Whether a given MT799 commits the sender depends entirely on what it says and on whether the person who authorised it could bind the bank. Comfort-type MT799s are commonly worded “without any engagement or responsibility on our part”.
Three myths circulate widely:
- “MT799 pre-advice of an SBLC.” UCP 600 article 11 recognises a pre-advice for documentary credits, sent as MT705; the issuing bank that sends one is irrevocably committed to issue without delay on terms not inconsistent with it. There is no equivalent rule that turns a free-format MT799 into a promise to issue a standby.
- “RWA via MT799.” A bank stating that it is “ready, willing and able” to issue or fund is not a commitment to do so. See our guide to the RWA letter.
- “POF via MT799.” A free-format message cannot hold or reserve funds. A genuine proof of funds is a bank statement or a letter from the account holder’s bank.
For structured information about an existing transaction, such as a fraud alert or a financing request, Swift also provides MT759.
What is an MT103 and what changed with ISO 20022?
MT103 is the single customer credit transfer: the instruction a bank sends to pay a sum on behalf of its customer to a beneficiary at another bank. An MT103 copy shows that an instruction was issued. It does not show that the beneficiary’s account was credited; a payment can still be rejected, returned, or held for compliance checks along the chain. Copies are also easy to fabricate, so a seller should rely on its own account, not on a document sent by the buyer.
For cross-border payments, Swift has moved to ISO 20022 messages, where the customer credit transfer is the pacs.008 message. The coexistence period between MT and ISO 20022 for cross-border payments ended on 22 November 2025. The term “MT103” remains in everyday use. Category 7 trade messages (MT700, MT760 and related messages) were not part of that payments migration and continue to be exchanged in MT format.
Expressions such as “server-to-server”, “IP/IP transfer”, “download” or “conditional SWIFT payment” do not describe how bank payments work and appear frequently in fraudulent offers.
How do you verify a SWIFT message?
- Ask that any credit, guarantee or standby be advised to you through your own bank, and rely on your bank’s written confirmation.
- Check the issuing bank’s BIC and legal name in Swift’s BIC directory, and confirm that the institution is licensed by its supervisor.
- Contact the issuing bank through contact details you found independently, never the phone number or email in the document you received.
- Do not pay upfront fees to obtain or “release” a message. Banks charge their own customers for instruments they issue; third parties cannot sell a Swift message.
- If in doubt, use an independent document verification before shipping goods or signing a contract.
How Star Alliance helps
We help importers, exporters and contractors prepare the request for a documentary credit, guarantee or standby: review of the transaction, the file and the proposed wording, and coordination with the parties and the issuing institutions. We do not send or receive Swift messages and do not issue instruments; issuance and the final decision belong to the bank. If you need an instrument for a real transaction, start with our standby letter of credit service page.
Frequently asked questions
Can a company or broker send an MT760?
No. Only financial institutions connected to Swift send MT messages, and they send them to institutions they have a relationship with. A company asks its bank to issue the instrument; the bank sends the message.
Is an MT799 a guarantee?
No. MT799 is a free-format message. It can carry any text, including statements made without engagement. A demand guarantee or standby is issued by MT760, and a documentary credit by MT700.
What is the difference between MT700 and MT760?
MT700 issues a documentary credit, payable against documents that evidence a commercial transaction, usually under UCP 600. MT760 issues a demand guarantee or standby letter of credit, payable against a complying demand, usually under URDG 758 or ISP98.
Does an MT103 copy prove I have been paid?
No. It shows that a payment instruction was sent. Only a credit on your own account, confirmed by your bank, shows that funds have arrived.
Is MT103 still used after the ISO 20022 migration?
For cross-border payments, Swift’s coexistence period between MT and ISO 20022 ended on 22 November 2025, and the equivalent message is pacs.008. The name MT103 is still widely used in conversation. Trade messages such as MT700 and MT760 remain MT messages.
Sources
- Swift — Category 7: Documentary Credits and Guarantees/Standby Letters of Credit, Message Reference Guide (Standards MT November 2023)
- Swift — ISO 20022: Implementation (end of CBPR+ coexistence)
- Swift — Business Identifier Code (BIC)
- ICC — UCP 600, Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits
- U.S. SEC, Investor.gov — Investor Alert: “Prime Bank” Investments Are Scams
Star Alliance Consulting editorial team · Updated 31 October 2026