Short answer
A “leased” SBLC or bank guarantee is an instrument a provider claims its bank will issue for a client’s use in exchange for a fee, often with a promise that it can be monetized. Banks issue guarantees on behalf of their own customer, who bears the reimbursement risk, to support a specific obligation. FBI warnings list claims about leased instruments and SBLC trading among common features of fraud.
Key points
- A bank issues a guarantee or SBLC on behalf of its own customer (the applicant), who must reimburse the bank if the beneficiary draws. That is why an unrelated party cannot simply “rent” it.
- Leased-instrument offers usually involve an upfront fee, an MT799 or MT760 “delivery”, and a promise of monetization or trading returns. Regulators describe these elements as typical of scams.
- A copy, PDF or screenshot of an MT760 proves nothing; only your own bank can confirm receipt of an authenticated SWIFT message.
- Legitimate third-party support exists, for example a parent company asking its bank to guarantee a subsidiary, but the supporting party then carries the credit risk knowingly.
- Realistic alternatives include an instrument from your own bank with cash margin, export credit agency cover, surety bonds, counter-guarantee structures and LC confirmation.
What is a leased SBLC or bank guarantee?
“Leased”, “rented” or “BG lease” offers describe a standby letter of credit (SBLC) or bank guarantee that a provider, often presented as a fund, a trust or a company with a credit line at a large bank, will arrange for a client who does not have the credit standing to obtain one. The usual sequence is:
- the client signs a “deed of agreement” or similar contract and pays a fee, typically quoted as a percentage of face value and often split between an upfront part and a later part;
- the provider’s bank is said to send an MT799 announcing readiness, followed by an MT760 to the client’s bank;
- the client is told to use the instrument as collateral, to have it “monetized”, or to place it in a trading programme;
- the instrument is to be “returned” at the end of a fixed term, often one year and one day.
The offer is aimed at companies with a real project and a real financing gap. That is what makes it attractive, and also what makes the loss painful when the instrument does not perform as promised.
How is a real bank guarantee or SBLC issued?
A genuine instrument starts with a credit relationship. The applicant is the bank’s own customer. The bank completes its know-your-customer checks, analyses the applicant’s capacity to reimburse, and approves a facility, often secured by a cash margin, other collateral or an existing credit line. The applicant signs a counter-indemnity or reimbursement agreement.
The instrument names a beneficiary and supports an identified obligation: a supply contract, a construction contract, a loan, a lease of premises. The ICC model form for demand guarantees under URDG 758 includes a field identifying the underlying relationship. A standby is usually issued subject to ISP98, a demand guarantee subject to URDG 758. The issuing bank then sends the instrument by authenticated SWIFT message (MT760) to the beneficiary’s bank, which checks the authentication and advises it.
If the beneficiary makes a complying demand, the bank pays and debits the applicant. The exposure sits on the applicant’s credit limit until the instrument expires or is released. See our guides on bank guarantees and standby letters of credit.
Why banks do not issue guarantees for unrelated “lessees”
- Reimbursement risk. When a guarantee is drawn, the bank pays and claims the amount from its applicant. A provider that “leases” an instrument to an unrelated client would be guaranteeing that client’s performance for a fee. No credit committee approves that without analysing the client, which is precisely what the lease is supposed to avoid.
- Know your customer. Banks must understand who benefits from an instrument and why. An undertaking designed to circulate between unknown parties is a compliance concern, not a product.
- Purpose. A guarantee supports a specific obligation owed to a specific beneficiary. An instrument with no underlying transaction has no legitimate drawing scenario.
- Limits and capital. Guarantees and standbys count against the applicant’s credit limits and the bank’s own capital requirements. Banks do not issue them as idle collateral for third parties.
Legitimate third-party support does exist. A parent company, a shareholder or a partner can ask its bank to issue a guarantee for a subsidiary’s or a project’s obligation. It works because the supporting party knowingly accepts the credit risk of someone it knows, and its bank underwrites it like any other facility. That is a credit arrangement between related parties, not a rental.
Have a real transaction that needs an instrument? Tell us about it in two short steps. We review the operation and reply within 24 hours on business days with the options and next steps.
Discuss your transactionWhat happens in practice with leased-instrument offers
Outcomes reported in regulators’ warnings and investigations tend to follow a few patterns:
- the fee is paid and the instrument never arrives, followed by new fees for “compliance”, “SWIFT charges” or “insurance”;
- a PDF, an email or a screenshot of an “MT760” arrives, but the client’s bank has received nothing authenticated;
- an MT799 arrives stating that a bank is “ready, willing and able”, which creates no obligation (see RWA letters);
- a document arrives from an entity whose name resembles a real bank but which is unregulated or does not exist, a pattern the ICC Financial Investigation Bureau has reported;
- a lender asked to “monetize” the instrument declines, and the fee is not refunded.
The FBI warns that counterfeit SWIFT messages, including “MT 799” and “MT 760”, are used to make SBLC scams look legitimate, and that fraudsters make improper references to real banks without their knowledge. Presenting an instrument that later proves false can also expose the presenter to claims from its own counterparties.
Red flags
- The words “lease”, “rent”, “seasoned”, “fresh cut” or “one year and one day”.
- An unnamed “top 25” issuing bank, revealed only after payment.
- Fees payable before any bank has issued or advised anything, especially to personal accounts or attorney escrow accounts.
- A promise that the instrument can be monetized at a fixed percentage, or will generate trading returns.
- No question asked about your contract, your business or the obligation the instrument will support.
- Secrecy, non-circumvention agreements and pressure to sign quickly.
- Requests for a “client information sheet” with copies of passports and bank details before any verifiable proposal.
What are the legitimate alternatives?
| Situation | Alternative to explore |
|---|---|
| A supplier wants payment security | An SBLC or payment guarantee from your own bank, possibly with a partial cash margin, or a documentary letter of credit |
| A buyer or project owner wants a performance, advance payment or bid guarantee | A guarantee from your bank, or a surety bond from an insurance company where the beneficiary accepts it |
| Your bank’s limit is too small | Cash collateral, cover from an export credit agency, or a related party (parent, shareholder) acting as applicant or counter-guarantor |
| The beneficiary does not accept your bank | A local guarantee issued against your bank’s counter-guarantee, confirmation of a letter of credit, or multilateral programmes such as the IFC Global Trade Finance Program for participating issuing banks |
| You need capital for a project | Equity, project finance or development finance: an instrument is not a source of capital |
Example (illustrative): a contractor wins a public works contract and must provide a performance guarantee its bank cannot fully cover. Instead of renting an instrument, it offers its bank a partial cash margin and a counter-indemnity from its parent company, and asks the project owner whether a surety bond is acceptable for the remainder.
How Star Alliance can help
Star Alliance Consulting does not lease, sell or monetize instruments and has no special access to any bank. We review the transaction, help prepare the file and the proposed guarantee or standby wording, and coordinate with the parties and the issuing institutions; the decision to issue belongs to the issuing institution. If you have received a leasing offer, you can ask us to review it, or describe your guarantee need.
Frequently asked questions
Can you legally lease a bank guarantee?
There is no standard bank product called a leased guarantee. A third party can legitimately support your obligation, for example a parent company asking its bank to issue a guarantee, but it then carries your credit risk and its bank underwrites it like any other facility. Offers to rent instruments to unrelated clients for a fee do not match banking practice.
The provider sent me a copy of an MT760. Is that proof?
No. SWIFT messages are exchanged and authenticated between banks, and a PDF or screenshot can be fabricated. The FBI warns that counterfeit MT799 and MT760 messages are used in SBLC scams. Ask your own bank to confirm in writing that it has received an authenticated message, with reference, amount and beneficiary.
If my bank receives a genuine MT760 in my favour, can I borrow against it?
You can use it for its stated purpose, drawing it if the conditions are met. Borrowing against it requires a lender that accepts the issuing bank and the wording, and lenders generally want an instrument issued in their own favour for an obligation they understand.
Is a surety bond an alternative to a bank guarantee?
Often, for performance, advance payment or bid obligations, if the beneficiary accepts it. Bonds are issued by insurance companies under their own underwriting, and acceptance and wording vary by country and project.
I already paid a lease fee. What should I do?
Stop further payments, keep every document and message, contact your bank and report the matter to the police or the competent authority; in the United States, the FBI’s IC3 receives complaints. Be cautious with anyone offering to recover your money for a further fee.
Sources
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) — FBI Warns of Fraud Actors Scamming Investors Through Fictitious Standby Letters of Credit (2019)
- FBI Honolulu — FBI Warns Public About Platform Trading Investment Scams (2015)
- ICC Commercial Crime Services — FIB issues warning on fake bank guarantees (2009)
- ICC Academy — URDG 758: a practitioner’s guide to demand guarantees
- IFC — Global Trade Finance Program (GTFP)
Star Alliance Consulting editorial team · Updated 31 October 2026